Skip to content
files.co

files.co vs iLovePDF: which one actually keeps your files private?

An honest comparison of files.co and iLovePDF. Where iLovePDF wins, where files.co does, and the one real difference: your file never gets uploaded.

DCDavid Carrero · · 7 min readUpdated

If you’ve searched for a PDF tool in the last decade, you’ve landed on iLovePDF. It’s one of the most recognizable names in the space, it’s been around since 2010, and it does pretty much everything. So why would you pick anything else?

This is a fair comparison, not a hit piece. iLovePDF is a real tool made by a real company in Barcelona, and for a lot of people it’s a good fit. But files.co works in a fundamentally different way, and that difference matters more for some files than others. Here’s how to tell which one you actually want.

At a glance

files.co iLovePDF
Where the work happens In your browser, on your device On their servers
Your file is uploaded Never Yes, on every task
Retention Nothing to retain — it never arrives Deleted after ~2 hours on the free tier, per their policy
Works with the network off Yes, once the page has loaded No
Price Free, all 32 tools Free tier, Premium from about $7/month
Account Not needed Not needed for the free tier
File size Limited by your device’s memory, ~50 MB in practice Around 25 MB on most free tools
OCR Free Paid tier
Desktop app Files.co PDF Suite, for Mac and Windows Yes, for Mac and Windows
Mobile app No — installable as a PWA Yes, iOS and Android
API and SSO No Yes

Two different machines

The thing to understand first is where the work happens.

iLovePDF is a cloud service. When you merge or compress a PDF there, your file is uploaded to their servers, processed on their infrastructure, and the result is sent back to you. That’s the whole model. Their public policy says free-tier files are deleted after two hours, and they use TLS in transit and encryption at rest. During processing, though, the file sits on a machine they control and can read.

files.co runs the PDF engine inside your browser. You pick a file, the engine that’s already loaded in the page does the work right there on your device, and you download the result. Nothing gets sent to a server, because there’s no server in the middle doing the processing. The page loads once, and after that the work is local.

Same end result, completely different path to get there.

Privacy: a promise vs. a property

This is the part that actually separates the two, so it’s worth being precise.

iLovePDF protects your file with a policy. They receive your document, then promise to delete it after a couple of hours and not misuse it in the meantime. That promise might be kept perfectly every single time. But it’s still a promise about behavior, and the file genuinely lands on their servers for it to be processed. Logs, IP addresses, filenames, and timestamps tend to outlive the file itself. If you’re merging a meme or a flyer, none of this matters.

files.co protects your file with architecture. The document never reaches us, so there’s nothing for us to delete, log, leak, or hand over. We can’t retain a file we never received. You don’t have to trust a retention timer you can’t see, because there’s no upload in the first place.

And you can check this yourself. Open files.co, press F12 to open DevTools, go to the Network tab, tick Preserve log, then run a real task like a merge. You’ll watch the page assets load and then… nothing. No request carrying your PDF up to a server. For an even blunter test, turn off your Wi-Fi after the page loads and run it again. It still works, because everything it needs is already on your machine. A cloud tool would simply stop.

So the question isn’t “do you trust iLovePDF?” It’s whether you’d rather rely on a good policy or on a tool that’s structurally unable to see your file. For a signed contract, an invoice, a medical record, or anything with personal data, that distinction is the whole ballgame.

Price and limits

iLovePDF has a free tier, and it’s genuinely useful. But it’s the front door to a paid product. Free files are capped at around 25 MB for most tools, you’ll hit queue throttling and ads, and Premium upsells show up after a few operations. Premium runs about $7/month for higher limits and no ads, and there are Business team plans on top of that. OCR, for example, sits behind the paid tier.

files.co has no paid tier, because there’s nothing to upsell when the processing is local. All 32 tools are free, with no daily task limit, no account, and no sign-up. File size is capped by your device’s memory rather than a billing rule (around 50 MB per file in practice). There’s no “free for 2 tasks then pay” wall, because there’s no server counting your tasks.

Tools and platforms: where iLovePDF is genuinely strong

Now the honest part in the other direction.

iLovePDF has a deeper catalog and a longer history, and it reaches places we don’t. Mobile is the clearest one: it has native apps for iOS and Android, and files.co doesn’t. If you want an API for automation, or team features like SSO and admin controls, that’s iLovePDF’s territory and it’s a real advantage. The brand recognition also means there’s a great deal of documentation and community help out there.

files.co covers the 32 tools most people actually reach for: merge, split, compress, rotate, watermark, protect, sign, images-to-PDF, page numbers, and the rest. On the desktop there is now Files.co PDF Suite, a native Mac and Windows app with its own viewer that also does everything on your machine. On the phone it’s a web app you can install as a PWA — there’s no native mobile app today. And if your workflow needs an API or enterprise admin tooling, files.co isn’t built for that.

So which one?

Pick iLovePDF if you want native mobile apps, need an API or team/SSO features, or you’re working with files where privacy genuinely doesn’t matter and you just want the deepest tool catalog with a familiar brand.

Pick files.co if your files are sensitive, you’d rather not upload them at all, and you want every tool free with no account and no limits. Contracts, invoices, tax paperwork, anything with a name and address on it: those don’t need to take a trip to a server just to get stapled together or shrunk for email.

Both tools work. They just disagree about where your file should be while the work happens. files.co keeps it on your machine, and you can verify that in under a minute. That’s the call to make.

Frequently asked questions

Does files.co upload my PDF to a server?

No. The PDF engine runs inside your browser, so the file is read into memory on your own machine and the result is written straight back to your downloads folder. You can confirm it in under a minute: open DevTools with F12, go to the Network tab, tick Preserve log and run a merge. No request carries your document anywhere. Turning off the network after the page loads is the blunter version of the same test.

Is iLovePDF safe to use?

For most documents, yes. They use TLS in transit, encryption at rest, and their policy says free-tier files are deleted after about two hours. The difference is not that iLovePDF is careless — it is that their protection is a promise about behaviour and ours is a property of the architecture. Your file reaches their servers for the work to happen; it never reaches ours. For a meme or a flyer that distinction is irrelevant. For a signed contract or a medical record it is the whole decision.

Is files.co free because of a trial, or will there be a paid tier later?

All 32 web tools are free with no account, no daily limit and no upsell, and there is nothing to meter because the processing happens on your device rather than on a server we pay for. The desktop app is the only paid thing we sell, and even there the 26 tools it ships with are free — Pro is a one-time purchase that unlocks volume work and signing with your system certificate.

What can iLovePDF do that files.co cannot?

Native mobile apps for iOS and Android, an API for automation, and team features such as SSO and admin controls. It also has a deeper catalogue built over more than a decade. If any of those is what you need, it is the better tool and we would rather say so than pretend otherwise.

Explore by category